gogrlx/nats-server
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/gogrlx/nats-server.git synced 2026-04-02 03:38:42 -07:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Reduce messages in chaos tests

Browse Source 
It doesn't really appear as though, for what these tests are trying to
prove, that an excessively large number of messages is required. Instead
let's drop the count a little in the hope that they run a bit faster.

Signed-off-by: Neil Twigg <neil@nats.io>
This commit is contained in:
Neil Twigg
2023-06-09 17:07:53 +01:00
parent 9d2ae42956
commit 7de3568f39
1 changed files with 12 additions and 8 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

20
server/jetstream_chaos_test.go
View File

@@ -329,7 +329,8 @@ func createStreamForConsumerChaosTest(t *testing.T, c *cluster, replicas, numMes
// Verify ordered delivery despite cluster-wide outages
func TestJetStreamChaosConsumerOrdered(t *testing.T) {
const numMessages = 30_000
const numMessages = 5_000
const numBatch = 500
const maxRetries = 100
const retryDelay = 500 * time.Millisecond
const fetchTimeout = 250 * time.Millisecond
@@ -407,7 +408,7 @@ func TestJetStreamChaosConsumerOrdered(t *testing.T) {
// Simulate application processing (and gives the monkey some time to brew chaos)
time.Sleep(10 * time.Millisecond)
if i%1000 == 0 {
if i%numBatch == 0 {
t.Logf("Consumed %d/%d", i, numMessages)
}
}
@@ -416,7 +417,8 @@ func TestJetStreamChaosConsumerOrdered(t *testing.T) {
// Verify ordered delivery despite cluster-wide outages
func TestJetStreamChaosConsumerAsync(t *testing.T) {
const numMessages = 30_000
const numMessages = 5_000
const numBatch = 500
const timeout = 30 * time.Second // No (new) messages for 30s => terminate
const maxRetries = 25
const retryDelay = 500 * time.Millisecond
@@ -480,7 +482,7 @@ func TestJetStreamChaosConsumerAsync(t *testing.T) {
timeoutTimer.Reset(1 * time.Second)
}
if received.count()%1000 == 0 {
if received.count()%numBatch == 0 {
t.Logf("Consumed %d/%d", received.count(), numMessages)
}
@@ -535,7 +537,8 @@ func TestJetStreamChaosConsumerAsync(t *testing.T) {
// The consumer connection is also periodically closed, and the consumer 'resumes' on a different one
func TestJetStreamChaosConsumerDurable(t *testing.T) {
const numMessages = 30_000
const numMessages = 5_000
const numBatch = 500
const timeout = 30 * time.Second // No (new) messages for 60s => terminate
const clusterSize = 3
const replicas = 3
@@ -703,7 +706,7 @@ func TestJetStreamChaosConsumerDurable(t *testing.T) {
}
}
if received.count()%1000 == 0 {
if received.count()%numBatch == 0 {
t.Logf("Consumed %d/%d, duplicate deliveries: %d", received.count(), numMessages, deliveryCount-received.count())
// Close connection and resume consuming on a different one
resetDurableConsumer()
@@ -740,7 +743,8 @@ func TestJetStreamChaosConsumerDurable(t *testing.T) {
func TestJetStreamChaosConsumerPull(t *testing.T) {
const numMessages = 10_000
const numMessages = 5_000
const numBatch = 500
const maxRetries = 100
const retryDelay = 500 * time.Millisecond
const fetchTimeout = 250 * time.Millisecond
@@ -845,7 +849,7 @@ func TestJetStreamChaosConsumerPull(t *testing.T) {
}
}
if !isDupe && received.count()%1000 == 0 {
if !isDupe && received.count()%numBatch == 0 {
t.Logf("Consumed %d/%d (duplicates: %d)", received.count(), numMessages, deliveredCount-received.count())
}
}