basically a gw subject propagation issue could be hidden behind a leaf
node.
also change error text when this was the case
Signed-off-by: Matthias Hanel <mh@synadia.com>
The system will allow an update to a stream, and subsequently all attached consumers, to be placed in another cluster either directly or via tag placement.
The meta layer will scale the underlying peerset appropriately to straddle the two clusters for both the stream and consumers, taking into account the consumer type.
Control will then pass to the current leaders of the assets who will monitor the catchup status of the new peers.
(Note we can optimize this later to only traverse once across a GW for any given asset, but for now this is simpler)
Once the original leaders have determined the assets are synched it will pass leadership to a member of the new peerset.
Once the new leader has been elected, it will forward a request for the meta layer to shrink the peerset by removing the old peers.
Signed-off-by: Derek Collison <derek@nats.io>
* added max_ack_penind setting to js account limits
because of the addition, defaults now have to be set later (depend on
these new limits now)
also re-organized the code to closer track how stream create looks
Signed-off-by: Matthias Hanel <mh@synadia.com>
Also fixed a bug that could cause memory based replicated consumers to no longer work after snapshots and server restarts.
The snapshot logic would allow non-state changing updates to continously grow the raft logs. We also were too conservative on when we snapshotted and why.
Also added in ability to have FileStore.Compact() reclaim space from the block file from the head of last changed block.
Signed-off-by: Derek Collison <derek@nats.io>
The default value is lowered from 20,000 to 1,000. This does not
seem to have a performance degradation impact, but may help
with scalability at scale.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Kozlovic <ivan@synadia.com>
* Adding server limits (max ack pending/dedupe window) to js config
Also shifting consumer config check to jsConsumerCreate as in clustered
mode this was enforced in the wrong place
Signed-off-by: Matthias Hanel <mh@synadia.com>
Would possibly show up when a consumer leader changes for a consumer
that had redelivered messages and for instance messages were inbound
on the stream.
Resolves#2912
Signed-off-by: Ivan Kozlovic <ivan@synadia.com>
Previously we would rely more heavily on Go's garbage collector since when we loaded a block for an underlying stream we would pass references upward to avoimd copies.
Now we always copy when passing back to the upper layers which allows us to not only expire our cache blocks but pool and reuse them.
The upper layers also had changes made to allow the pooling layer at that level to interoperate with the storage layer optionally.
Also fixed some flappers and a bug where de-dupe might not be reformed correctly.
Signed-off-by: Derek Collison <derek@nats.io>
Since the "next" timer value is set to the AckWait value, which
is the first element in the BackOff list if present, the check
would possibly happen at this interval, even when we were past
the first redelivery and the backoff interval had increased.
The end-user would still see the redelivery be done at the durations
indicated by the BackOff list, but internally, we would be checking
at the initial BackOff's ack wait.
I added a test that uses the store's interface to detect how many
times the checkPending() function is invoked. For this test it
should have been invoked twice, but without the fix it was invoked
15 times.
Also fixed an unrelated test that could possibly deadlock causing
tests to be aborted due to inactivity on Travis.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Kozlovic <ivan@synadia.com>
Removed the warnings, instead have a sync.Map where they are
registered/unregistered and can be inspected with an undocumented
monitor page.
Added the notion of "in progress" which is the number of messages
that have beend pop()'ed. When recycle() is invoked this count
goes down.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Kozlovic <ivan@synadia.com>
We have seen situations where when a lot of pending messages accumulate,
there is a contention between the processing of the ACKs and the
checking of the pending map.
Decision is made to abort checking of pending list if processing of
ack(s) would be delayed because of that. The result is that a
redelivery may be post-poned.
Internally, the ACKs are also now using a queue to prevent processing
of them from the network handler, which could cause head-of-line
blocking, especially bad for routes.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Kozlovic <ivan@synadia.com>
Also added in more optimized version to select the first matching message in a message block for LoadNextMsg.
Signed-off-by: Derek Collison <derek@nats.io>
When a stream has multiple subjects and a consumer filters the stream to a small and spread out list of messages the logic would do a linear scan looking for the next message for the filtered consumer.
This CL allows the store layer to utilize the per subject info to improve the times.
Signed-off-by: Derek Collison <derek@nats.io>
If the consumer's sequence was not the same than the stream's sequence,
then the redelivery would always use the first duration from the
BackOff list.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Kozlovic <ivan@synadia.com>
This allows a consumer to have exponential backoffs vs static AckWait and MaxDeliver.
When BackOff is set it will overridde AckWait to BackOff[0] and MaxDeliver will be len(BackOff)+1.
Signed-off-by: Derek Collison <derek@nats.io>
We will only send if all peers in our group are >= 2.7.1 and we will check for updates.
When a consumer follower takes over it will notify all pending requests that those requests are invalid now.
Signed-off-by: Derek Collison <derek@nats.io>
This should help with GC pressure, however, it may have an effect
on performance (based on some benchmark). Calling sync.Pool.Get/Put
too often has a performance impact...
Signed-off-by: Ivan Kozlovic <ivan@synadia.com>
