Added the sleep back in to TestAuthorizationTimeout which got removed in #493.
This was causing the test to fail intermittently, though it would
usually pass on Travis CI or with the -race flag since these slowed it
down enough.
gnatsd currently uses a global logger. This can cause some problems
(especially around the config-reload work), but global variables are
also just an anti-pattern in general. The current behavior is
particularly surprising because the global logger is configured through
calls to the Server.
This addresses issue #500 by removing the global logger and making it a
field on Server.
In case one creates a server instance with New() and then starts
the http server manually (s.StartHTTPMonitoring()), calling
s.Shutdown() would not stop the http server because Shutdown()
would return without doing anything if `running` was not true.
This boolean was set to true only in `s.Start()`.
Also added StartMonitoring() to perform the options check and
selectively start http or https server to replace individual calls.
This is useful for NATS Streaming server that will now be able
to call s.StartMonitoring() without having to duplicate code
about options checks and http server code.
This is related to PR #481
When TLS and authorization is enabled, the authorization timeout can
fire during the TLS handshake, causing the server to write the
authorization timeout error string into the client socket, injecting
what becomes bad data into the TLS handshake. This creates misleading
errors on the client such as tls: oversized record received with length
21024.
This moves the authorization timeout scheduling to after the TLS
handshake to avoid the race. This should be safe since TLS has its own
handshake timeout. Added a unit test that fails with the old behavior
and passes with the new. LMK if you can think of a better way to test
this.
Fixes#432
Changing from being the number of seconds to a time.Duration.
For backward compatibility, the configuration with the number
of seconds is still accepted but an error message is printed
asking the user to convert to duration.
Resolves#487
- Removed unnecessary cast check to (*net.TCPConn). When the timer
fires, the connection is already established. Replaced with check
that connection has not been closed.
- Add PING test that checks that pings are sent to TLS connections.
- Changed Go version to 1.7.5 in travis.
- Removed test package from code coverage.
- Get gosimple package
- Updated staticcheck's URL
- Moved build and above checks in `before_script` section to fail fast
- Fixed reports from gosimple
This happens sometimes, and the latest occurence was today:
https://github.com/nats-io/java-nats/issues/96
When it happens, there is no error but subscribers would not receive
anything, etc...
This PR uses the fact that clients set the field Lang in the CONNECT
protocol that ROUTEs do not. I have checked that all Apcera supported
clients do set Lang in the CONNECT protocol.
If we plan to add Lang for routes, we need to find another field or
use a new one, in which case that would work only for new clients
(that would need to be updated).
With this change, when the server accepts a connection on the route
port and detects that this protocol field is present, it now closes
the client connection.
The nice thing is that newer clients, when incorrectly connecting
to the route port, get from the route's INFO the list of client URLs,
which means that on the initial connect error, they are able to
subsequently connect to the proper client port, so it is transparent
to the user (which may or may not be a good thing). However, it is not
guaranteed because if the client is not setting NoRandomize to true,
the client URL is added but the array shuffled, so it is possible that
the client library does not find the correct port in the connect loop.
Staticcheck has probably been updated and is finding new errors.
They have been fixed.
Also, moved the run of staticcheck before running the test suite,
so if it fails, it fails sooner ;-).
We use a hardcoded value of 2 seconds for Write deadline when
writing data to client's socket.
This PR makes that value configurable.
Question is should we push the setting down to the client's object
to avoid indirection such as client.srv.opts.WriteDeadline?
