TestMQTTQoS2RetriesPublish to 100ms, and in TestMQTTQoS2RetriesPubRel to
50ms.
A lesser value caused another PUBLISH to be fired while the test was
still processing the final QoS2 flow. Reduced the number of retries we
wait for to make the test a little quicker.
TestMQTTQoS2RetriesPublish to 100ms, and in TestMQTTQoS2RetriesPubRel to 50ms.
A lesser value caused another PUBLISH to be fired while the test was still processing the final QoS2 flow. Reduced the number of retries we wait for to make the test a little quicker.
Tracing the connect (ack?) read times in `TestMQTTSubPropagation` showed
that they come in the 2-3s range during normal execution, and it appears
that they occasionally exceed the 4s timeout.
I am not sure exactly why MQTT CONNECT takes such a long time, but as
the name of the test suggests, perhaps it has to do with session
propagation in a cluster.
As per specification MQTT-3.3.1-8, we are now setting the RETAIN
flag when delivering to new subscriptions and clear the flag in
all other conditions.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Kozlovic <ivan@synadia.com>
The `.` character will be transformed to `//` in NATS subject. For
instance an MQTT message published on `spBv1.0/plant1` would
be received by a NATS subscriber as `spBv1//0.plant1`.
Conversely, a NATS message published on `spBv1//0.plant1` would
be received by an MQTT subscriber as `spBv1.0/plant1`.
Resolves#1879Resolves#3482
Signed-off-by: Ivan Kozlovic <ivan@synadia.com>
I was running a manual test moving from dev to this branch and
noticed that the consumer would receive only 1 message of the 10
messages sent as retained. So I modified the test to verify that
we receive them all and we did not.
The reason was that after the transfer we need to refresh the state
of the stream (stream info) since we attempt to load all messages
based on the state's sequences.
I have also modified a bit the code to update the MaxMsgsPer once
all messages have been transferred.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Kozlovic <ivan@synadia.com>
This was ill-advised by me, not understanding that the messages stream for MQTT was interested policy based.
Interest policy based streams require consumers to match the replica count.
Signed-off-by: Derek Collison <derek@nats.io>
A simple configuration like this:
```
...
mappings = {
foo: bar
}
mqtt {
port: 1883
}
```
would cause an MQTT subscription on "bar" to not receive messages
published on "foo".
In otherwords, the subject transformation was not done when parsing
a PUBLISH packet.
This PR also handles the case of service imports where transformation
occurs after the initial publish parsing.
Resolves#3547
Signed-off-by: Ivan Kozlovic <ivan@synadia.com>
A request to `$SYS.REQ.SERVER.PING.JSZ` would now return something
like this:
```
...
"meta_cluster": {
"name": "local",
"leader": "A",
"peer": "NUmM6cRx",
"replicas": [
{
"name": "B",
"current": true,
"active": 690369000,
"peer": "b2oh2L6w"
},
{
"name": "Server name unknown at this time (peerID: jZ6RvVRH)",
"current": false,
"offline": true,
"active": 0,
"peer": "jZ6RvVRH"
}
],
"cluster_size": 3
}
```
Note the "peer" field following the "leader" field that contains
the server name. The new field is the node ID, which is a hash of
the server name.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Kozlovic <ivan@synadia.com>
* better error when peer selection fails
It is pretty hard to diagnose what went wrong when not enough peers for
an operation where found. This change now returns counts of reasons why
peers where discarded.
Changed the error to JSClusterNoPeers as it seems more appropriate
of an error for that operation. Not having enough resources is one of
the conditions for a peer not being considered. But so is having a non
matching tag. Which is why JSClusterNoPeers seems more appropriate
In addition, JSClusterNoPeers was already used as error after one call
to selectPeerGroup already.
example:
no suitable peers for placement: peer selection cluster 'C' with 3 peers
offline: 0
excludeTag: 1
noTagMatch: 2
noSpace: 0
uniqueTag: 0
misc: 0
Examle for mqtt:
mid:12 - "mqtt" - unable to connect: create sessions stream for account "$G":
no suitable peers for placement: peer selection cluster 'MQTT' with 3 peers
offline: 0
excludeTag: 0
noTagMatch: 0
noSpace: 0
uniqueTag: 0
misc: 0
(10005)
Signed-off-by: Matthias Hanel <mh@synadia.com>
* review comment
Signed-off-by: Matthias Hanel <mh@synadia.com>
If a client with a given client ID is connected and while connected
another client tries to reuse the same client ID, the spec says that
the old client be closed and the new one accepted.
However, the server protects from this flapping happening all the time
by rejecting new clients that try to connect at a very fast pace.
However, the server was closing a misbehaving client after a second
delay (to prevent immediate reconnect if the client library does that)
but was not blocking the read loop and the compounding issue was that
if that misbehaving client is REALLY misbehaving and not waiting for
the CONNACK to send more protocols (for instance SUB) the server would
panic because the client was not fully configured.
To prevent that, the server will now "block" this misbehaving client
in its readLoop before closing the connection, preventing processing
of possible protocols that follow the CONNECT.
Resolves#3313
Signed-off-by: Ivan Kozlovic <ivan@synadia.com>
There is a mechanism to detect if a connection somewhere in the
cluster is using the session ID of an existing one, and if so,
close one as a duplicate.
However, when different domains are used, they should not be considered
duplicates.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Kozlovic <ivan@synadia.com>
When there was a failure to delete a QoS1 consumer, the session
would still be deleted, which would cause orphaned consumers.
In case of error, the session record will not be deleted, which means
that it is still possible to restart the session and then close
it (with the clean flag).
Relates to #3116
Signed-off-by: Ivan Kozlovic <ivan@synadia.com>
Ability to override the stream and consumers replica count, which is by default
determined based on the cluster size.
```
mqtt {
port: 1883
stream_replicas: 5
consumer_replicas: 1
}
```
The above would allow *new* MQTT streams to be created with a replicas
factor of 5 (it will be an error if the cluster does not have that
many nodes, and error will occur at runtime when the first client
on a given account connects), and new consumers would be R=1.
The MQTT existing streams/consumers for an account are not modified.
The stream_replicas can also obviously be reduced to 1 for a cluster
of 3 nodes if one desire to have those streams as R=1.
A value of 0 or negative is considered letting the server pick
the value (from 1 to 3 depending on standalone/cluster size).
There is another property that allows the consumers to be created
with memory storage instead of file:
```
mqtt {
..
consumer_memory_storage: true
}
```
Those new settings are global and apply to new streams/consumers
only.
Related to #3116
Signed-off-by: Ivan Kozlovic <ivan@synadia.com>
Update warning
Signed-off-by: Ivan Kozlovic <ivan@synadia.com>
Also had to change all references from `path.` to `filepath.` when
dealing with files, so that it works properly on Windows.
Fixed also lots of tests to defer the shutdown of the server
after the removal of the storage, and fixed some config files
directories to use the single quote `'` to surround the file path,
again to work on Windows.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Kozlovic <ivan@synadia.com>
This allows stream placement to overflow to adjacent clusters.
We also do more balanced placement based on resources (store or mem). We can continue to expand this as well.
We also introduce an account requirement that stream configs contain a MaxBytes value.
We now track account limits and server limits more distinctly, and do not reserver server resources based on account limits themselves.
Signed-off-by: Derek Collison <derek@nats.io>
Along a leaf node connection, unless the system account is shared AND the JetStream domain name is identical, the default JetStream traffic (without a domain set) will be denied.
As a consequence, all clients that wants to access a domain that is not the one in the server they are connected to, a domain name must be specified.
Affected from this change are setups where: a leaf node had no local JetStream OR the server the leaf node connected to had no local JetStream.
One of the two accounts that are connected via a leaf node remote, must have no JetStream enabled.
The side that does not have JetStream enabled, will loose JetStream access and it's clients must set `nats.Domain` manually.
For workarounds on how to restore the old behavior, look at:
https://github.com/nats-io/nats-server/pull/2693#issuecomment-996212582
New config values added:
`default_js_domain` is a mapping from account to domain, settable when JetStream is not enabled in an account.
`extension_hint` are hints for non clustered server to start in clustered mode (and be usable to extend)
`js_domain` is a way to set the JetStream domain to use for mqtt.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Hanel <mh@synadia.com>
