mirror of
https://github.com/gogrlx/nats-server.git
synced 2026-04-02 03:38:42 -07:00
- [X] Tests added - [X] Branch rebased on top of current main (`git pull --rebase origin main`) - [X] Changes squashed to a single commit (described [here](http://gitready.com/advanced/2009/02/10/squashing-commits-with-rebase.html)) - [x] Build is green in Travis CI - [X] You have certified that the contribution is your original work and that you license the work to the project under the [Apache 2 license](https://github.com/nats-io/nats-server/blob/main/LICENSE) ### Changes proposed in this pull request: Fixes a race condition in some leader failover scenarios leading to messages being potentially sourced more than once. In some failure scenarios where the current leader of a stream sourcing from other stream(s) gets shutdown while publications are happening on the stream(s) being sourced leads to `setLeader(true)` being called on the new leader for the sourcing stream before all the messages having been sourced by the previous leader are completely processed such that when the new leader does it's reverse scan from the last message in it's view of the stream in order to know what sequence number to start the consumer for the stream being sourced from, such that the last message(s) sourced by the previous leader get sourced again, leading to some messages being sourced more than once. The existing `TestNoRaceJetStreamSuperClusterSources` test would sidestep the issue by relying on the deduplication window in the sourcing stream. Without deduplication the test is a flapper. This avoid the race condition by adding a small delay before scanning for the last message(s) having been sourced and starting the sources' consumer(s). Now the test (without using the deduplication window) never fails because more messages than expected have been received in the sourcing stream. (Also adds a guard to give up if `setupSourceConsumers()` is called and we are no longer the leader for the stream (that check was already present in `setupMirrorConsumer()` so assuming it was forgotten for `setupSourceConsumers()`)
Tests
Tests that run on Travis have been split into jobs that run in their own VM in parallel. This reduces the overall running time but also is allowing recycling of a job when we get a flapper as opposed to have to recycle the whole test suite.
JetStream Tests
For JetStream tests, we need to observe a naming convention so that no tests are omitted when running on Travis.
The script runTestsOnTravis.sh will run a given job based on the definition found in ".travis.yml".
As for the naming convention:
- All JetStream tests name should start with
TestJetStream - Cluster tests should go into
jetstream_cluster_test.goand start withTestJetStreamCluster - Super-cluster tests should go into
jetstream_super_cluster_test.goand start withTestJetStreamSuperCluster
Not following this convention means that some tests may not be executed on Travis.