mirror of
https://github.com/taigrr/nats.docs
synced 2025-01-18 04:03:23 -08:00
add note about JWT support
Signed-off-by: Colin Sullivan <colin@synadia.com>
This commit is contained in:
commit
8b087e1c10
@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ mappings = {
|
||||
# In this example bar.a.b would be mapped to baz.b.a.
|
||||
bar.*.*: baz.$2.$1
|
||||
|
||||
# You can scope mappings to to a particular cluster
|
||||
# You can scope mappings to a particular cluster
|
||||
foo.cluster.scoped : [
|
||||
{ destination: bar.cluster.scoped, weight:100%, cluster: us-west-1 }
|
||||
]
|
||||
@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ With this mapping:
|
||||
Messages that were originally published to `bar.a.b` are remapped in the server to `baz.b.a`.
|
||||
Messages arriving at the server on `bar.one.two` would be mapped to `baz.two.one`, and so forth.
|
||||
|
||||
## Weighted Mappings for A/B Testing or Canary Releases.
|
||||
## Weighted Mappings for A/B Testing or Canary Releases
|
||||
|
||||
Traffic can be split by percentage from one subject to multiple subjects. Here's an example
|
||||
for canary deployments, starting with version 1 of your service.
|
||||
@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ Now shutdown the version 1 instances of your service.
|
||||
|
||||
## Traffic Shaping in Testing
|
||||
|
||||
Traffic shaping is useful in testing. You might have a service that runs in QA
|
||||
Traffic shaping is useful in testing. You might have a service that runs in QA
|
||||
that simulates failure scenarios which could receive 20% of the traffic to test
|
||||
the service requestor.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -145,5 +145,5 @@ and the unaccounted for 2% would simulate message loss.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
*Note: Subject Mapping and Traffic Shaping are also supported in the NATS
|
||||
JWT model, although only through the [JWT API](https://github.com/nats-io/jwt).
|
||||
`nsc` tooling support for subject mapping is coming soon.*
|
||||
JWT model, although currently only through the [JWT API](https://github.com/nats-io/jwt).
|
||||
`nsc` tooling support for subject mapping is coming soon.*
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user